\nTom Barrack\u2019\u0131n son a\u00e7\u0131klamas\u0131, Suriye politikas\u0131na dair \u201cy\u00fcksek d\u00fczey diplomatik analiz\u201d olarak sunuluyor; ancak dikkatle incelendi\u011finde kar\u015f\u0131m\u0131za \u00e7\u0131kan \u015fey, politikadan ziyade kaba bir etno-jeopolitik matematik:
\nYPG = PKK \u2192 K\u00fcrt = G\u00fcvenlik Sorunu.<\/p>\n
Bu denklem, bilimsel de\u011fildir; fakat belli ki uluslararas\u0131 ili\u015fkilerde ge\u00e7erlilik i\u00e7in do\u011fruluk de\u011fil, i\u015fe yararl\u0131l\u0131k \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fct kabul edilmektedir. Zira form\u00fcl\u00fcn tek amac\u0131, K\u00fcrd\u2019\u00fcn iradesini herhangi bir sosyal kategoriden \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131p su\u00e7 teorisine eklemlemektir.<\/p>\n
Barrack\u2019\u0131n Suriye\u2019ye dair \u201ctek halk, tek ordu, tek devlet\u201d g\u00fczellemesinin, bilimsel anlam\u0131 da nettir: Heterojen toplumlarda ulus-devlet\u00e7ilik, bask\u0131 tekeliyle y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen bir laboratuvar deneyidir. K\u00fcrtler hari\u00e7 herkes \u00fczerine uygulanabilir; \u00e7\u00fcnk\u00fc K\u00fcrt varl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n tan\u0131nmas\u0131, bu laboratuvar\u0131n en pahal\u0131 maddesidir.<\/p>\n
Federalizmi \u201cba\u015far\u0131s\u0131zl\u0131k\u201d olarak damgalamas\u0131 da ayn\u0131 zihinsel kimyaya i\u015faret eder. Tarihsel analiz a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a g\u00f6sterir ki:<\/p>\n
Federal yap\u0131lar de\u011fil, tek\u00e7i devlet\u00e7ilik,<\/p>\n
Halklar\u0131n kimlik talepleri de\u011fil, devletin kimlik dayatmas\u0131,<\/p>\n
\u00d6zy\u00f6netim modelleri de\u011fil, Merkeziyet\u00e7ilik,
\nkriz ve i\u00e7 sava\u015f \u00fcretmi\u015ftir.
\nTarih bunu s\u00f6yler; Barrack ise tarihe kulak t\u0131kayan bir jeopolitik nostaljist olarak davran\u0131r.<\/p>\n
\u00dcstelik ironik bi\u00e7imde, Barrack\u2019\u0131n savundu\u011fu \u201ctek\u00e7i devlet modeli\u201d, en \u00e7ok da Suriye\u2019nin mevcut \u00e7\u00f6k\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fc kurumsalla\u015ft\u0131rmaya yarar. Ayn\u0131 re\u00e7eteyi, Osmanl\u0131\u2019n\u0131n son y\u00fczy\u0131l\u0131nda, Irak\u2019\u0131n kurulu\u015funda, \u0130ran\u2019\u0131n modernle\u015fme projelerinde ve T\u00fcrkiye\u2019de defalarca g\u00f6rd\u00fck: Hepsinde sonu\u00e7, merkez b\u00fcy\u00fcrken halklar\u0131n yara i\u00e7inde terk edilmesi oldu. Demek ki Barrack\u2019\u0131n re\u00e7etesi, b\u00f6lgede bar\u0131\u015f \u00fcretmek i\u00e7in de\u011fil, s\u0131k\u0131 y\u00f6netimli kaosu s\u00fcrd\u00fcrmek i\u00e7in \u00f6nerilmektedir.<\/p>\n
Bu noktada esas soru ortaya \u00e7\u0131kmaktad\u0131r:
\nK\u00fcrtler, ni\u00e7in h\u00e2l\u00e2 \u201cdevletle\u015fme riski ta\u015f\u0131yan\u201d bir tehlike olarak g\u00f6r\u00fcl\u00fcyor?
\nBilimsel cevap basittir:
\n\u00c7\u00fcnk\u00fc K\u00fcrtlerin varl\u0131\u011f\u0131, jeopolitik sim\u00fclasyonlar\u0131n d\u0131\u015f\u0131na ta\u015fmaktad\u0131r. K\u00fcrtler, diplomatik m\u00fczakerelerin de\u011fil, toplumsal s\u00fcreklili\u011fin bir sosyolojik verisidir. Devletlerin bilmedi\u011fi \u015fey, halklar\u0131n yo\u011fun bir tarihsel haf\u0131zaya sahip oldu\u011fudur. Bu haf\u0131za, d\u0131\u015f g\u00fc\u00e7lerin l\u00fctuflar\u0131yla de\u011fil, d\u0131\u015f g\u00fc\u00e7lerin hatalar\u0131yla b\u00fcy\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla Barrack\u2019\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131klamalar\u0131, \u201cUzman g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fc\u201d de\u011fil; K\u00fcrdistan\u2019\u0131n her par\u00e7as\u0131nda defalarca \u00e7\u00f6km\u00fc\u015f bir paradigman\u0131n kabusuyla konu\u015fmas\u0131d\u0131r. Bu kabus, K\u00fcrtleri korkutmak i\u00e7in de\u011fil; K\u00fcrt siyasal bilincinin b\u00fcy\u00fcd\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc itiraf etmek i\u00e7in vard\u0131r.<\/p>\n
Bug\u00fcn\u00fcn ger\u00e7ekli\u011fi \u015fudur:
\nK\u00fcrt kimli\u011fi, art\u0131k ink\u00e2rla y\u00f6netilecek ucuz bir jeopolitik de\u011fi\u015fken de\u011fildir.
\nDiplomatlar, K\u00fcrtleri form\u00fcle indirgedik\u00e7e, K\u00fcrtler form\u00fclleri bozan de\u011fi\u015fken haline gelmektedir.<\/p>\n
Ve tarihin ironisi tam da burada gizlidir:
\nBar\u0131\u015f masalar\u0131n\u0131 K\u00fcrtleri yok sayarak kuranlar, o masan\u0131n \u00fcst\u00fcnde kendi politikalar\u0131n\u0131n otopsisini yapmaya mecbur kalacaklard\u0131r.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Tom Barrack\u2019\u0131n son a\u00e7\u0131klamas\u0131, Suriye politikas\u0131na dair \u201cy\u00fcksek d\u00fczey diplomatik analiz\u201d olarak sunuluyor; ancak dikkatle incelendi\u011finde kar\u015f\u0131m\u0131za \u00e7\u0131kan \u015fey, politikadan ziyade kaba bir etno-jeopolitik matematik: YPG = PKK \u2192 K\u00fcrt = G\u00fcvenlik Sorunu. Bu denklem, bilimsel de\u011fildir; fakat belli ki uluslararas\u0131 ili\u015fkilerde ge\u00e7erlilik i\u00e7in do\u011fruluk de\u011fil, i\u015fe yararl\u0131l\u0131k \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fct kabul edilmektedir. Zira form\u00fcl\u00fcn tek amac\u0131, […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":1035881,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[26],"tags":[31],"class_list":["post-1035880","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-forum","tag-onemli"],"blocksy_meta":[],"seo_head":"\n